Current:Home > ContactNorth Carolina bill seeks to restrict public and media access to criminal autopsy reports -FundCenter
North Carolina bill seeks to restrict public and media access to criminal autopsy reports
View
Date:2025-04-27 21:10:15
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Access by the public and the media to North Carolina autopsy reports related to criminal investigations would be significantly restricted under a bill considered Tuesday by a legislative committee.
The proposal was debated by senators but not voted upon. It would explicitly add written autopsy reports from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to the list of documents exempt from public records when they are part of an investigative file held by prosecutors trying to solve a crime. The written reports could be accessed after a probe or prosecution is complete, one of the bill’s proponents said.
Those reports often provide the public with information about the details of a crime while a case is pending.
The bill also would repeal a state law that had allowed people to inspect and review — but not copy — autopsy photos, videos and recordings under supervision. Those records also would be considered within a prosecutor’s private case file if part of a crime investigation.
Robeson County Republican Sen. Danny Britt, a defense attorney and former prosecutor shepherding the bill, said the details were still being worked out between state health officials, a group representing district attorneys and others. An updated version was likely to emerge next week.
But Britt said it was important that autopsy records of all kinds — including written reports — be kept out of the public sphere while a potential homicide crime was investigated or prosecuted in the interests of justice.
Releasing autopsy details or obtaining any access to photos or videos from the death review could unfairly taint a case, he said.
“I think that due process in the courts is more important than the public knowing about what happened related to someone’s death,” Britt told reporters after the committee meeting. “I also think it’s more important for that person who’s being prosecuted to have due process, and that due process not being potentially denied so that case gets overturned and then that victim doesn’t receive the justice they deserve, or that victim’s family.”
When asked by Mecklenburg County Democrat Sen. Mujtaba Mohammed if the bill would also restrict a victim’s family access to the reports, Britt said they generally wouldn’t have access as a way to prevent images and videos from being shared to social media. They could, however, sit down with a prosecutor to view the photos, he said.
The North Carolina Conference of District Attorneys supports the autopsy record access changes, said Chuck Spahos, the conference’s general counsel. Content in the prosecutor’s investigative file is already exempt from public records law but can be released later.
“We don’t give the investigative file up during a prosecution, and we shouldn’t be giving up the record of the autopsy during a prosecution,” Spahos said. “If all that stuff gets released in the public, a case gets tried in the public, and that’s not fair to the criminal defendant.”
In addition to autopsy report provisions, the bill also would add training requirements for county medical examiners and further outline how examiners can request and obtain a deceased person’s personal belongings as evidence. If changes aren’t made to the bill, it would make current challenges faced by medical examiners “much, much more difficult,” Mark Benton, chief deputy health secretary at the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, said during public comments on the bill.
The measure would have to pass the Senate and House to reach Gov. Roy Cooper’s desk.
veryGood! (2898)
Related
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Social media influencer is charged with joining the Jan. 6 attack on the US Capitol
- Trump’s lawyers say it is impossible for him to post bond covering $454 million civil fraud judgment
- Alabama football coach Kalen DeBoer gets eight-year contract: Salary, buyout, more to know
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Missing NC mother, 2 young children found murdered in Charlotte, suspect arrested: Police
- Kate Middleton and Prince William Seemingly Step Out Together After Photo Controversy
- Oregon man found guilty of murder in 1980 cold case of college student after DNA link
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Stock market today: Asian shares are mixed after Bank of Japan ups key rate for 1st time in 17 years
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Child’s decomposed body found in duffel bag in Philadelphia neighborhood
- Sunken 18th century British warship in Florida identified as the lost 'HMS Tyger'
- Mix & Match Kate Spade Outlet Wallets & Bags for an Extra 20% off: $31 Wristlets, $55 Crossbodies & More
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Afghan refugee convicted of murder in a case that shocked Albuquerque’s Muslim community
- It's 2024 and I'm sick of silly TV shows about politics.
- Lawsuits against insurers after truck crashes limited by Georgia legislature
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Love Is Blind's Chelsea and Jimmy Reunite Again in Playful Video
Why Bella Hadid's Morning Wellness Routine Is Raising Eyebrows
It's 2024 and I'm sick of silly TV shows about politics.
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Protecting abortion rights in states hangs in the balance of national election strategies
The Daily Money: Has the Great Resignation fizzled out?
When is spring 2024? What to know about the vernal equinox as we usher in a new season